Rip Threadripper!
B Bryan Valionis Guest Sep 20, 2017 #4 The 16 core TR is $1000, so is the XE double the performance as its double the price?
B Bryan Valionis Guest Sep 20, 2017 #8 The issue is that the XE doesn't have ECC memory support and only 44 PCIE lanes. Presumably those buying a $2000 CPU will run critical applications for which ECC support is essential
The issue is that the XE doesn't have ECC memory support and only 44 PCIE lanes. Presumably those buying a $2000 CPU will run critical applications for which ECC support is essential
A Abdi Harris Guest Sep 20, 2017 #11 Actually Intel win in overclocking i Mean if we overclock to 5 ghz its double the performance... Maybe
Actually Intel win in overclocking i Mean if we overclock to 5 ghz its double the performance... Maybe
K Kyol Hodgson Guest Sep 20, 2017 #13 Intel is still the backstabbing faceless money grabbing entity it always was. Support what's best for competition, support what's best for the consumer. Support AMD.
Intel is still the backstabbing faceless money grabbing entity it always was. Support what's best for competition, support what's best for the consumer. Support AMD.
Y Yan Andrukhov Guest Sep 20, 2017 #15 >is $1000 more expensive than threadripper >performance gain is minimal at best especially for the extra price >rip threadripper lol what?
>is $1000 more expensive than threadripper >performance gain is minimal at best especially for the extra price >rip threadripper lol what?
Y Yan Andrukhov Guest Sep 20, 2017 #17 honestly the only thing x299 has going for it over x399 is board availability, x299 has way more options at the moment
honestly the only thing x299 has going for it over x399 is board availability, x299 has way more options at the moment
T Tyler Erickson Guest Sep 20, 2017 #18 Ok so I've seen leaked benchmarks where threadripper wins, loses, evens out or gets annihilated, is no one actually waiting for official benchmarks
Ok so I've seen leaked benchmarks where threadripper wins, loses, evens out or gets annihilated, is no one actually waiting for official benchmarks
M Matthew Reed Guest Sep 20, 2017 #19 Yeah and no one be able to buy that especially when most people's build are 2k anyways
M Martin Rogers Guest Sep 20, 2017 #20 Lol 20-30% more performance but costs double!!! Stop it Intel. You still lose.