Anyone ever wonder why they don't replace leavers with bots?

[Dante Hendrix]

Anyone ever wonder why they don't replace leavers with bots?

 

[Aaron Norton]

That would be awful

 

[Aaron Norton]

Id rather be missing a teammate then have a bot

 

[Teigan Lissel]

Because this game revolves around ult economy and a boy would feed hardcore

 

[Shawn Williams]

I'll take not feeding ults to the enemy team, instead just alter respawn times or giving a slight buff to remaining players.

 

[Matt James]

It would be like Stephen Hawking joining your team.

 

[Tung Nguyen]

Yea let's form the 6-stack. Then boot the crappiest player. And then here comes that pro bot we've been depending on lmao

 

[Jiří Müller]

Because then majority of the playerbase will see that even bot is better than them and their excuses about bad team wouldn't work anymore

 

[Geun Hyoung Kang]

Like cdgo?

 

[Geun Hyoung Kang]

Nah like custom games, the highest bot level, is better than a high gold or low plat player. Even tho they will never agree

 

[Aaron Milne]

Or even allow quick players to have the option to backfill

 

[Ashley Lorena]

actually most bots have a really good IA, specially sombra and Zen bot, those two destroy the shit out of you if you don't pay attention because A I M B O T

 

[Mohammed Al-Najjar]

its hard for bots to play hanzo or widow xDD

 

[Dylan Lais]

I dunno, you can feed in hots too, but it replaces teammates with a bot if they leave. I've seen it before where the bot is actually better than the person it replaces, and we end up turning the tide of the match because of it.

 

[Matthew Osterman]

NO

 

[Matthew Osterman]

God dammit

 

[Matthew Osterman]

Replacing with bots takes away from the experience.

 

[Ruben Brito]

someone should be able to join and not be penalized if he loses but be slightly rewarded if wins

 

[Jimmy L'honneur]

This could work in lower ranks but would just be ridiculous in plat and higher....